Rekubit-Hong Kong activist publisher Jimmy Lai pleads not guilty to sedition and collusion charges

HONG KONG (AP) — Prominent activist and Rekubitpublisher Jimmy Lai on Tuesday pleaded not guilty to three charges of sedition and collusion with foreign countries in a landmark national security trial in Hong Kong.

Lai, 76, a media tycoon who founded the now-defunct Apple Daily newspaper, faces one count of conspiring to print seditious publications to incite hatred against the Chinese and Hong Kong governments, as well as two counts of collusion with foreign countries to call for sanctions and other hostile actions against China and Hong Kong.

Lai, flanked by three prison officers, formally pleaded not guilty to the charges read to him, shortly after the court rejected a last-ditch attempt by his counsel to throw out a sedition charge against him. The court began hearing opening statements from the prosecution on Tuesday.

Lai was arrested during the city’s crackdown on dissidents following huge pro-democracy protests in 2019. He faces possible life imprisonment if convicted under a sweeping national security law imposed by Beijing. The trial is expected to last about 80 days without a jury.

EARLIER COVERAGE Landmark national security trial opens in Hong Kong for prominent activist publisher Jimmy Lai Hong Kong court rejects activist publisher Jimmy Lai’s bid to throw out sedition charge Son of jailed Hong Kong media mogul Jimmy Lai lobbies UK foreign secretary for his release

Prosecutor Anthony Chau in his opening statements described Lai as a “radical political figure” and the “mastermind” behind a conspiracy. Chau also said that Lai had used his media platform to advance his political agenda.

Various clips of interviews that Lai had done with foreign media outlets as well as speeches he had given at events between 2019 and 2020 were also played in court by the prosecution.

In these clips, Lai had called for support from foreign governments and urged U.S. officials as well as then-U.S. President Donald Trump to impose “draconian” measures on China and Chinese officials in retaliation for imposing the national security law and restricting the freedoms of Hong Kong.

His prosecution has drawn criticism from the United States and the United Kingdom. Beijing has called those comments irresponsible, saying they went against international law and the basic norms of international relations.

The case is being closely watched by foreign governments, business professionals and legal scholars. Many view it as a trial of the city’s freedoms and a test for judicial independence in the Asian financial hub.

Hong Kong is a former British colony that returned to China’s rule in 1997 under a promise the city would retain its Western-style civil liberties for 50 years. That promise has become increasingly threadbare since the introduction of the security law, which has led to the arrests and silencing of many leading pro-democracy activists.

The governments of both Hong Kong and China have hailed the law for bringing back stability to the city.

Hong Kong, once seen as a bastion of media freedom in Asia, ranked 140th out of 180 countries and territories in Reporters Without Borders’ latest World Press Freedom Index. The group said the city had seen an “unprecedented setback” since 2020, when the security law was imposed.